I ran a 5K on Saturday.  As I am wont to do when in the company of a lot of people using their bodies (or, truth be told, anywhere people are standing, sitting, or moving in the slightest) I studied people’s bodies.

(No, not like that.)

I watched how their bodies were working.

Before I continue, I need to say that this post might make some of you uncomfortable.  Or upset.  If the 2005 version of me had read this, I would have had a strong reaction.

Do me a favor?  Read it, and instead of getting bound up in how you feel, ask yourself why you might be feeling that way.  Observe your reactions because they might be telling you something.

Anyway – back to the race.

When I am out driving around in my car, I pay careful attention to folks I see running.  (See above – I watch bodies.)  I perform a mental census and keep track of how many people I see running who are actually strong enough to be out there running.

I did the same on Saturday.

The number I usually reach is around 33%.

That’s right.  By my judgment, only about a third of the people I see out running are really strong enough to be running.

Before I continue, I want to review two key principles of exercise science – progression and adaptation.  (Remember, we already talked about specificity in this post?)

Quoting exercise physiologist Elizabeth Quinn:

The principle of progression implies that there is an optimal level of overload that should be achieved, and an optimal time frame for this overload to occur. A gradual and systematic increase of the workload over a period of time will result in improvements in fitness without risk of injury. If overload occurs too slowly, improvement is unlikely, but overload that is increased too rapidly may result in injury or muscle damage. For example, the weekend athlete who exercises vigorously only on weekends violates the principle of progression and most likely will not see obvious fitness gains.

And, again quoting Quinn:

Adaptation refers to the body’s ability to adjust to increased or decreased physical demands.

As I like to tell my classes, when you train you can’t just go from A to Z.  You have to go through B, C, D, … you get the drill.  If you try to skip from A to Z, you either end up not accomplishing your goal (best case scenario), injured (worst case), or both (worst, worst case.)

I would argue that a lot of people out running have skipped from A to Z.  What are all those missing letters?


Here’s my argument:

We sit at desks all day long.  We drive in cars.  We sit at dinner.  We sit in front of the television.  We park close to the store .  We drive our kids to school.

We think of these activities as benign, but actually, they change the way our body is put together.  Our pelvic musculature, our glutes, our abs and our backs – they are not being subjected to the demands that they were naturally designed to do.  So they’ve waved the white flag.  They’ve become flaccid, or flat, or whatever – anything but robust, vibrant and functional.

As a result, our overall health suffers.  So what do we do?

Why, we run, of course!  Isn’t that the best way to “get in shape?”

Trouble is, that whole progression thing gets in the way.  You can’t take your weak, flat glutes that have forgotten how to walk all day, enter them in a 5K, and expect to a) improve your overall health or b) avoid injury.

The results are visually staggering.  Watch a mass of people running and here’s what you’ll see:

  • the shuffler, whose feet hardly come off the ground
  • the wrap-arounder, who kicks one of her feet up and around
  • the double wrap-arounder, who kicks both of his feet up and around
  • the chin-jutter, whose head comes so far out over her body I want to cry in pain for her
  • the sloucher, whose shoulders are rolled inward
  • the twinkle toes, with feet beautifully pointed outward, in first position

and more!

So what do we do to counter our unnatural and weak gaits?

Well, we go buy expensive running shoes.  Of course!

We go to one of the high-end running stores, have our stride analyzed, and shell out $100+ for a pair of shoes to “correct” our imbalance.  Or our pronation.  Or our supination.

Anything to make the knee pain go away.  (Or back pain.  Or hip pain.)

What we don’t do, is honor the principle of progression.  We don’t dial back the running and begin to walk everywhere.  We don’t analyze our whole body alignment to see where we might be weak or out of sorts.  We don’t ensure that our glutes and cores are strong enough to walk before we start running.

I am as guilty as the next person and speak from experience.  So the next time I address this, I’ll talk a little about my own injuries (and stubbornness) and how rehab plus a walking regimen rescued me from years of chronic pain.

6 Responses to “Should You Be Running?”

  1. on 06 Nov 2012 at 9:57 amMonica

    Thank you for writing this. I feel like we live in a culture of running right now that I constantly feel guilty for not being a runner and that I should be out there training for the next 5K, half or whatever. But the fact is, I don’t think my body likes running that much. It doesn’t make me feel better or stronger. Although I think it might be the skipping to A to Z you mention, the expectation that you can just “start.” I much prefer walking and have been trying to incorporate more of it into my exercise routine.

  2. on 06 Nov 2012 at 1:19 pmkelly @kellynaturally

    I considered myself to be in okay shape when I started running. Meaning, I wasn’t overweight, I could stretch without hurting, I liked doing outdoors/active stuff, but I was never “a runner”, but I couldn’t get up my 3 flights of condo steps without getting out of breath, so I knew it was time to “get in shape”. In the past I’d always tried to get up & just START RUNNING like as if I could just DO it because I was THERE. And I ended up hating it or giving it up, or having really sore legs/feet/knees, whatever and deciding running “wasn’t for me”.

    This time, (in April of last year) I started running just an eighth of a mile the first day, til I was out of breath, then I WALKED, and considered it a success, and did it again the next day, and the next – just a tiny bit at a time – only running while it was comfortable to do so. By October of that year, I ran in a 10k race. By May of the next year, I did a 10 mile race. Was I “slow” at getting from no mileage to 10 miles? Maybe. But I never injured myself, and I’m still a runner now, when I never thought I would be.
    I don’t buy into “no pain, no gain”. Anything that’s worth doing is worth doing well, and if you’re hurting or straining to do it, it’s not doing it well.

    Good article!

  3. on 06 Nov 2012 at 4:56 pmKristine Rudolph

    I totally agree with you on no pain no gain. I tell my classes all the time that exercise / movement should make you feel vibrant and renewed, not beaten to a pulp. If your exercise impairs with your ability to live your life (as in, I can’t walk today) then you need to reassess. I love that you practiced patience and ended up making more progress than when you were hard-charging. Thanks for sharing.

  4. on 09 Nov 2012 at 11:27 amDanita

    While I feel I am a runner at heart- I ran track in high school and greatly miss clearing my head on long distance training runs- I also feel my body has changed so much since having two kids. Now when I do run, I feel like my gait is off. It makes perfect sense that one would need to start out with walking and then gradually increase the distance or pace to prevent injury. This post really makes me thing about improving my walking and running posture.

  5. […] you read my post on whether or not you should be running?  Because it’s kind of along the same […]

  6. on 19 Jun 2013 at 6:00 amKristine Rudolph » June 19th

    […] if you have read this blog much, you’ve picked up on that.  (Like with this post, and this post, and this post, for […]

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply